Verified July 2, 2026 · Published by San Luis Way Editorial
Reliability score
7.6/10
Medium
Claims analyzed
12
Individually verified
Verdict breakdown
Every claim in the source article, verified individually. Jump to any claim for full evidence.
"the 105-meter Tamul waterfall"
105 meters is the figure used consistently across Spanish-language encyclopedic, tourism and news sources for Tamul, widely cited as the tallest/largest waterfall in San Luis Potosí state.
3 sources cited
"Its hub is Ciudad Valles, 251 km (~3.5 h) from San Luis Potosí city via highway MEX-70"
The 251 km road distance is confirmed precisely by route calculators. The stated drive time of "~3.5 h" is optimistic — the same calculators report closer to 4 hours under normal conditions.
3 sources cited
"Pay at the box office on the day: MX$180 adults, MX$120 seniors/kids 6–12, + mandatory guide MX$30 (Spanish) or MX$60 (English)... Reserve online first... between 24 hours and 60 days before your visit... Closed Tuesdays."
Every element of this claim matches the official Las Pozas ticketing system: the box-office price of MX$180 (vs. a lower MX$170 online-reservation price that does not include payment), the MX$30/MX$60 mandatory guide surcharge, the 24-hour-to-60-day booking window, and the Tuesday closure.
4 sources cited
"you drive toward Tamapatz, then walk ~15 min and descend ~586 steps to the rim of a 512-m-deep vertical cave"
512 m total depth (with ~376 m of that being sheer free-fall) is the figure used by Wikipedia and regional tourism/news sources. The 586-step descent matches the majority of sources, though at least one cites 686 steps.
3 sources cited
"Cascadas de Micos... $100 (chaleco incluido)... Circuito de saltos ≈ $180"
Both figures match current sources: MX$100 general entry (life jacket included, mandatory), and MX$180 per person for the direct-booked 7-waterfall jump circuit (tour-operator adventure packages run higher, MX$750–1,000+, but that is a different, bundled product).
3 sources cited
"Puente de Dios... ≈ $70 + chaleco $30–50... Tue–Sun 8:00–16:00"
MX$70 was a valid figure through 2025 but current 2026 reporting shows the price has moved — and sources genuinely disagree on by how much. Regional press reporting a March 1, 2026 price change cites MX$200 general admission plus MX$100 parking; other 2026 sources (including one dated March 18, 2026) still show ~MX$100; a third 2026 guide lists MX$150. The article's ~$70 figure appears to be the oldest and lowest of the four 2026 price points found, and the closing-hour claim (4 PM) also doesn't match any of the sources checked (which show 5 PM, 6 PM or 7 PM closes).
3 sources cited
"its six thermal springs hold 27–30°C water with up to 30 m visibility, and PADI schools run dives among petrified trees (permit ≈MX$1,300)"
All three figures — the 27–30°C temperature range, up to 30 m visibility, and the ~MX$1,300 diving permit — match dedicated diving-tourism sources for Media Luna in Rioverde. The MX$100 general entry and MX$150-per-tent camping fee from the article's prices table also check out.
3 sources cited
"Tamtoc (zona arqueológica)... $145... Solo domingos por ahora — verifica antes de ir" / "Currently Sundays only — verify before going"
MX$145 and Sunday-only access are both correct as the general/foreign-visitor rate and current (post-flood-damage) access schedule, per INAH's own site listing. What the claim omits is that INAH's official pricing is nationality-tiered (MX$145 general/foreign vs. MX$80 for Mexican nationals and residents) and that, under INAH's standard national policy, Mexican citizens and residents enter free on Sundays — which is precisely the only day Tamtoc is currently open. That is a materially relevant detail for readers, many of whom will be Mexican residents of San Luis Potosí.
3 sources cited
"Buses run SLP → Ciudad Valles in ~4 h 15 (from ~MX$598)"
Both figures check out: aggregator sites list fares from Ciudad Valles to San Luis Potosí starting near MX$599, and average trip duration is reported at approximately 4 hours 15 minutes.
3 sources cited
"raft the Class III rapids of the Tampaón canyon (~7 h with lunch, from ~MX$1,890 or USD $115 on Viator)"
The Class III rating, November–March season, and full-day/lunch-included structure are all well corroborated by multiple tour operators. The specific price point (~MX$1,890 / USD $115) could not be independently confirmed — Viator's listing page returned an access-blocked response during this investigation, and other operator listings found in this pass show a wide spread (roughly MX$796–1,386 for various package lengths), none matching MX$1,890 exactly.
3 sources cited
"Roughly November through April [is turquoise season]... During the rainy season (about June to October) the rivers run high and brown with sediment."
Independent Huasteca-focused travel guides consistently describe the same pattern: a June–October rainy season (peaking August–September) that turns rivers brown with sediment, followed by clearing/turquoise water from around October–November through April–May.
3 sources cited
"in the 2024 drought Tamul briefly ran dry, so late-season visitors should temper expectations"
The 2024 event is accurately described — La Jornada and other outlets reported Tamul running dry in February–March 2024 amid an extreme regional drought and unauthorized upstream irrigation extraction from the Río Gallinas. What the claim omits, and what matters for a guide "verified July 2026," is that the same phenomenon recurred in 2026: multiple outlets reported Tamul drying up again in April–May 2026 for the same reasons (irrigation extraction plus high temperatures), directly ahead of this article's stated verification date.
4 sources cited
"the 105-meter Tamul waterfall"
Investigation summary
105 meters is the figure used consistently across Spanish-language encyclopedic, tourism and news sources for Tamul, widely cited as the tallest/largest waterfall in San Luis Potosí state.
Sources (3)
Confidence: High— Multiple independent Spanish-language sources converge on the same figure.
"Its hub is Ciudad Valles, 251 km (~3.5 h) from San Luis Potosí city via highway MEX-70"
Investigation summary
The 251 km road distance is confirmed precisely by route calculators. The stated drive time of "~3.5 h" is optimistic — the same calculators report closer to 4 hours under normal conditions.
Sources (3)
Confidence: Medium— Distance is precisely verified; travel time is a reasonable but slightly optimistic rounding.
"Pay at the box office on the day: MX$180 adults, MX$120 seniors/kids 6–12, + mandatory guide MX$30 (Spanish) or MX$60 (English)... Reserve online first... between 24 hours and 60 days before your visit... Closed Tuesdays."
Investigation summary
Every element of this claim matches the official Las Pozas ticketing system: the box-office price of MX$180 (vs. a lower MX$170 online-reservation price that does not include payment), the MX$30/MX$60 mandatory guide surcharge, the 24-hour-to-60-day booking window, and the Tuesday closure.
Sources (4)
Confidence: High— Confirmed directly against the operator's own ticketing pages plus independent 2026 guides.
"you drive toward Tamapatz, then walk ~15 min and descend ~586 steps to the rim of a 512-m-deep vertical cave"
Investigation summary
512 m total depth (with ~376 m of that being sheer free-fall) is the figure used by Wikipedia and regional tourism/news sources. The 586-step descent matches the majority of sources, though at least one cites 686 steps.
Sources (3)
Confidence: High— Depth confirmed by primary encyclopedic and journalistic sources; step count has acceptable minor variance.
"Cascadas de Micos... $100 (chaleco incluido)... Circuito de saltos ≈ $180"
Investigation summary
Both figures match current sources: MX$100 general entry (life jacket included, mandatory), and MX$180 per person for the direct-booked 7-waterfall jump circuit (tour-operator adventure packages run higher, MX$750–1,000+, but that is a different, bundled product).
Sources (3)
Confidence: High— Two independent price checks agree with the published figures.
"Puente de Dios... ≈ $70 + chaleco $30–50... Tue–Sun 8:00–16:00"
Investigation summary
MX$70 was a valid figure through 2025 but current 2026 reporting shows the price has moved — and sources genuinely disagree on by how much. Regional press reporting a March 1, 2026 price change cites MX$200 general admission plus MX$100 parking; other 2026 sources (including one dated March 18, 2026) still show ~MX$100; a third 2026 guide lists MX$150. The article's ~$70 figure appears to be the oldest and lowest of the four 2026 price points found, and the closing-hour claim (4 PM) also doesn't match any of the sources checked (which show 5 PM, 6 PM or 7 PM closes).
Sources (3)
Confidence: Medium— High — Multiple dated 2026 regional-media sources agree the price has moved well past $70, even though they disagree with each other on the exact new number.
"its six thermal springs hold 27–30°C water with up to 30 m visibility, and PADI schools run dives among petrified trees (permit ≈MX$1,300)"
Investigation summary
All three figures — the 27–30°C temperature range, up to 30 m visibility, and the ~MX$1,300 diving permit — match dedicated diving-tourism sources for Media Luna in Rioverde. The MX$100 general entry and MX$150-per-tent camping fee from the article's prices table also check out.
Sources (3)
Confidence: High— Specialist diving sources and general tourism press independently agree.
"Tamtoc (zona arqueológica)... $145... Solo domingos por ahora — verifica antes de ir" / "Currently Sundays only — verify before going"
Investigation summary
MX$145 and Sunday-only access are both correct as the general/foreign-visitor rate and current (post-flood-damage) access schedule, per INAH's own site listing. What the claim omits is that INAH's official pricing is nationality-tiered (MX$145 general/foreign vs. MX$80 for Mexican nationals and residents) and that, under INAH's standard national policy, Mexican citizens and residents enter free on Sundays — which is precisely the only day Tamtoc is currently open. That is a materially relevant detail for readers, many of whom will be Mexican residents of San Luis Potosí.
Sources (3)
Confidence: Medium— INAH's own site confirms the tiered pricing; the free-Sunday policy is INAH's well-documented national standard but wasn't independently reconfirmed site-specifically for Tamtoc in this pass.
"Buses run SLP → Ciudad Valles in ~4 h 15 (from ~MX$598)"
Investigation summary
Both figures check out: aggregator sites list fares from Ciudad Valles to San Luis Potosí starting near MX$599, and average trip duration is reported at approximately 4 hours 15 minutes.
Sources (3)
Confidence: High— Fare and duration confirmed independently by two ticket aggregators.
"raft the Class III rapids of the Tampaón canyon (~7 h with lunch, from ~MX$1,890 or USD $115 on Viator)"
Investigation summary
The Class III rating, November–March season, and full-day/lunch-included structure are all well corroborated by multiple tour operators. The specific price point (~MX$1,890 / USD $115) could not be independently confirmed — Viator's listing page returned an access-blocked response during this investigation, and other operator listings found in this pass show a wide spread (roughly MX$796–1,386 for various package lengths), none matching MX$1,890 exactly.
Sources (3)
Confidence: Medium— Structural/seasonal claims verified; exact price unconfirmed due to a blocked source, not contradicting evidence.
"Roughly November through April [is turquoise season]... During the rainy season (about June to October) the rivers run high and brown with sediment."
Investigation summary
Independent Huasteca-focused travel guides consistently describe the same pattern: a June–October rainy season (peaking August–September) that turns rivers brown with sediment, followed by clearing/turquoise water from around October–November through April–May.
Sources (3)
Confidence: High— Multiple independent regional travel guides describe the same seasonal pattern in the same terms.
"in the 2024 drought Tamul briefly ran dry, so late-season visitors should temper expectations"
Investigation summary
The 2024 event is accurately described — La Jornada and other outlets reported Tamul running dry in February–March 2024 amid an extreme regional drought and unauthorized upstream irrigation extraction from the Río Gallinas. What the claim omits, and what matters for a guide "verified July 2026," is that the same phenomenon recurred in 2026: multiple outlets reported Tamul drying up again in April–May 2026 for the same reasons (irrigation extraction plus high temperatures), directly ahead of this article's stated verification date.
Sources (4)
Confidence: Medium— High — The 2024 event is well documented; the 2026 recurrence is independently confirmed by two dated regional outlets and directly undercuts the article's implicit "this was a one-time 2024 event" framing.
**Source Analyzed:** https://www.sanluisway.com/blog/huasteca-potosina-itinerary-2026
**Verification Date:** July 2, 2026
**Investigation Conducted By:** San Luis Way Fact-Check Team using AI-powered research agents
**Total Claims Analyzed** | 12
Verified TRUE | 7 PARTIALLY TRUE | 4 Verified FALSE | 0 UNVERIFIABLE | 0 OUTDATED | 1
**Overall Reliability Score:** 7.6/10
**Confidence Level:** Medium — Core facts (Tamul's height, Golondrinas depth/steps, Las Pozas' pricing and reservation mechanics, Media Luna's spring specs, bus fares/timing, turquoise-season windows) check out cleanly against primary and Tier-2/4 sources. Reliability is pulled down by one clearly outdated entry fee (Puente de Dios), one price claim with unresolved source conflict (Tampaón rafting), and two claims that are accurate but omit a materially relevant nuance (Tamtoc's free-Sunday policy for Mexican nationals; the 2024 drought framing that omits a 2026 recurrence).
**CLAIM:** "the 105-meter Tamul waterfall"
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** 105 meters is the figure used consistently across Spanish-language encyclopedic, tourism and news sources for Tamul, widely cited as the tallest/largest waterfall in San Luis Potosí state.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** The article correctly places the falls atop a 300-m-deep canyon on the Río Santa María, fed by the Río Gallinas, north of Aquismón — details that match the same sources.
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Multiple independent Spanish-language sources converge on the same figure.
**CLAIM:** "Its hub is Ciudad Valles, 251 km (~3.5 h) from San Luis Potosí city via highway MEX-70"
**VERDICT:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** The 251 km road distance is confirmed precisely by route calculators. The stated drive time of "~3.5 h" is optimistic — the same calculators report closer to 4 hours under normal conditions.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** 251 km is an exact match. But route-calculator drive times cluster around 3h57min–4h, not 3.5h — a modest but real understatement of ~25–35 minutes, which matters for itinerary planning (the article uses this timing to justify "arrive Ciudad Valles by midday" on Day 1).
**CONFIDENCE:** Medium — Distance is precisely verified; travel time is a reasonable but slightly optimistic rounding.
**CLAIM:** "Pay at the box office on the day: MX$180 adults, MX$120 seniors/kids 6–12, + mandatory guide MX$30 (Spanish) or MX$60 (English)... Reserve online first... between 24 hours and 60 days before your visit... Closed Tuesdays."
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** Every element of this claim matches the official Las Pozas ticketing system: the box-office price of MX$180 (vs. a lower MX$170 online-reservation price that does not include payment), the MX$30/MX$60 mandatory guide surcharge, the 24-hour-to-60-day booking window, and the Tuesday closure.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** The article's price ($180) matches the box-office rate reported by current 2026 sources, not the slightly cheaper online-reservation rate ($170) — an accurate and relevant distinction since Las Pozas currently requires in-person payment regardless of how you reserve.
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Confirmed directly against the operator's own ticketing pages plus independent 2026 guides.
**CLAIM:** "you drive toward Tamapatz, then walk ~15 min and descend ~586 steps to the rim of a 512-m-deep vertical cave"
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** 512 m total depth (with ~376 m of that being sheer free-fall) is the figure used by Wikipedia and regional tourism/news sources. The 586-step descent matches the majority of sources, though at least one cites 686 steps.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** The depth figure is uncontested across sources. The step count has minor variance (586 vs. 686) likely reflecting different named viewpoints/trailheads around the sinkhole; 586 is the more commonly cited figure and is not unreasonable.
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Depth confirmed by primary encyclopedic and journalistic sources; step count has acceptable minor variance.
**CLAIM:** "Cascadas de Micos... $100 (chaleco incluido)... Circuito de saltos ≈ $180"
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** Both figures match current sources: MX$100 general entry (life jacket included, mandatory), and MX$180 per person for the direct-booked 7-waterfall jump circuit (tour-operator adventure packages run higher, MX$750–1,000+, but that is a different, bundled product).
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** The article's numbers track the site-direct, walk-up prices rather than the bundled operator-package prices, which is the correct comparison for independent travelers (the article's audience).
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Two independent price checks agree with the published figures.
**CLAIM:** "Puente de Dios... ≈ $70 + chaleco $30–50... Tue–Sun 8:00–16:00"
**VERDICT:** 🔄 OUTDATED
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** MX$70 was a valid figure through 2025 but current 2026 reporting shows the price has moved — and sources genuinely disagree on by how much. Regional press reporting a March 1, 2026 price change cites MX$200 general admission plus MX$100 parking; other 2026 sources (including one dated March 18, 2026) still show ~MX$100; a third 2026 guide lists MX$150. The article's ~$70 figure appears to be the oldest and lowest of the four 2026 price points found, and the closing-hour claim (4 PM) also doesn't match any of the sources checked (which show 5 PM, 6 PM or 7 PM closes).
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** This is the weakest claim in the article. Given three mutually inconsistent 2026 prices (MX$100, MX$150, MX$200) already circulating in local press before the article's stated July 2026 verification date, publishing MX$70 as the base figure looks stale rather than simply "approximate." The hours claim (closes 4 PM) is also off — every source checked shows a later closing time (5–7 PM), though "last entry" vs. "closing time" could explain part of that gap. This is a real gap between what the article states and what current, dated, established regional media report.
**CONFIDENCE:** Medium-High — Multiple dated 2026 regional-media sources agree the price has moved well past $70, even though they disagree with each other on the exact new number.
**CLAIM:** "its six thermal springs hold 27–30°C water with up to 30 m visibility, and PADI schools run dives among petrified trees (permit ≈MX$1,300)"
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** All three figures — the 27–30°C temperature range, up to 30 m visibility, and the ~MX$1,300 diving permit — match dedicated diving-tourism sources for Media Luna in Rioverde. The MX$100 general entry and MX$150-per-tent camping fee from the article's prices table also check out.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** This is one of the article's cleanest, most technically specific claims, and it holds up across independent diving-focused and general-tourism sources alike.
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Specialist diving sources and general tourism press independently agree.
**CLAIM:** "Tamtoc (zona arqueológica)... $145... Solo domingos por ahora — verifica antes de ir" / "Currently Sundays only — verify before going"
**VERDICT:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** MX$145 and Sunday-only access are both correct as the general/foreign-visitor rate and current (post-flood-damage) access schedule, per INAH's own site listing. What the claim omits is that INAH's official pricing is nationality-tiered (MX$145 general/foreign vs. MX$80 for Mexican nationals and residents) and that, under INAH's standard national policy, Mexican citizens and residents enter free on Sundays — which is precisely the only day Tamtoc is currently open. That is a materially relevant detail for readers, many of whom will be Mexican residents of San Luis Potosí.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** The core facts (price tier, Sunday-only schedule, "verify before going" caveat) are accurate and appropriately hedged — the article deserves credit for flagging the schedule as provisional. But by quoting a single flat "$145" it implicitly directs all readers to the highest price tier, when Mexican nationals/residents pay less any day and free on Sundays — the only day the site is currently accessible.
**CONFIDENCE:** Medium — INAH's own site confirms the tiered pricing; the free-Sunday policy is INAH's well-documented national standard but wasn't independently reconfirmed site-specifically for Tamtoc in this pass.
**CLAIM:** "Buses run SLP → Ciudad Valles in ~4 h 15 (from ~MX$598)"
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** Both figures check out: aggregator sites list fares from Ciudad Valles to San Luis Potosí starting near MX$599, and average trip duration is reported at approximately 4 hours 15 minutes.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Fare and duration confirmed independently by two ticket aggregators.
**CLAIM:** "raft the Class III rapids of the Tampaón canyon (~7 h with lunch, from ~MX$1,890 or USD $115 on Viator)"
**VERDICT:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** The Class III rating, November–March season, and full-day/lunch-included structure are all well corroborated by multiple tour operators. The specific price point (~MX$1,890 / USD $115) could not be independently confirmed — Viator's listing page returned an access-blocked response during this investigation, and other operator listings found in this pass show a wide spread (roughly MX$796–1,386 for various package lengths), none matching MX$1,890 exactly.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** Season, classification and duration are solid. The price is plausible — it sits above the shorter 3-hour options found (MX$1,350) which is directionally consistent with a longer 7-hour, lunch-included package — but this investigation could not directly confirm the MX$1,890/$115 figure against Viator's live listing.
**CONFIDENCE:** Medium — Structural/seasonal claims verified; exact price unconfirmed due to a blocked source, not contradicting evidence.
**CLAIM:** "Roughly November through April [is turquoise season]... During the rainy season (about June to October) the rivers run high and brown with sediment."
**VERDICT:** ✅ TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** Independent Huasteca-focused travel guides consistently describe the same pattern: a June–October rainy season (peaking August–September) that turns rivers brown with sediment, followed by clearing/turquoise water from around October–November through April–May.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**CONFIDENCE:** High — Multiple independent regional travel guides describe the same seasonal pattern in the same terms.
**CLAIM:** "in the 2024 drought Tamul briefly ran dry, so late-season visitors should temper expectations"
**VERDICT:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY TRUE
**INVESTIGATION SUMMARY:** The 2024 event is accurately described — La Jornada and other outlets reported Tamul running dry in February–March 2024 amid an extreme regional drought and unauthorized upstream irrigation extraction from the Río Gallinas. What the claim omits, and what matters for a guide "verified July 2026," is that the same phenomenon recurred in 2026: multiple outlets reported Tamul drying up again in April–May 2026 for the same reasons (irrigation extraction plus high temperatures), directly ahead of this article's stated verification date.
**EVIDENCE CHAIN:**
**DETAILED ANALYSIS:** Framing this as a one-off "2024 drought" event understates the risk for a 2026 reader: the same dry-up recurred in April–May 2026, just weeks-to-months before this article's stated verification date. A guide published in July 2026 should flag this as a recurring seasonal risk tied to upstream irrigation practices, not a historical footnote from two years earlier.
**CONFIDENCE:** Medium-High — The 2024 event is well documented; the 2026 recurrence is independently confirmed by two dated regional outlets and directly undercuts the article's implicit "this was a one-time 2024 event" framing.
Structural, dimensional and mechanical facts — Tamul's height, Golondrinas' depth and step count, the Las Pozas reservation system, Media Luna's spring specs, and bus fares/timing — are all highly accurate and traceable to primary or Tier-2 sources. The article's weakest spot is **volatile, cash-economy entry pricing** at smaller sites (Puente de Dios in particular), where local operators appear to adjust prices faster than any published source, including this one, can track. A secondary pattern is **incomplete context** rather than wrong facts: the Tamtoc and 2024-drought claims are each technically true but omit a detail (free Sunday entry for nationals; the 2026 drought recurrence) that would materially change a reader's plans.
No evidence of promotional bias or undisclosed commercial ties — pricing is presented with appropriate hedging ("≈", "verify before going," "confirm locally") in most cases, which is good practice for a cash-based rural tourism circuit. The one place this hedging language should have been applied more aggressively is Puente de Dios, where the "≈" symbol is used but the underlying number itself is stale relative to current 2026 reporting.
The article's own sources section cites laspozasxilitla.org.mx, El Universal San Luis Potosí, INAH, SEGAM SLP, and Conagua/Wikipedia reporting — all appropriate Tier-1/Tier-2/Tier-4 sources for this subject matter. This investigation's independent searches corroborate that those are indeed the right sources to check, and mostly validate the figures drawn from them; the exceptions found here point to entry fees that appear to have moved between when the underlying research was done and the article's current form.
Tier 1 (Official/Primary): INAH, laspozasxilitla.org.mx (official ES/EN ticket pages), gob.mx press releases — 5 sources Tier 2 (Established Regional Media): El Universal San Luis Potosí, La Jornada, Telediario México, Quadratín San Luis Potosí, El Sol de San Luis, Potosinoticias — 8 sources Tier 4 (Specialist/Operator Sites): Noriega Scuba, Descubre el Buceo, Huaxteca.com, Civitatis, Las Pozas Facebook page — 6 sources Tier 6 (Aggregators/General Guides): Wikipedia (ES), Busbud, Obilet, Reservamos.mx, MejoresRutas.com, DistanciasKm.com, Rome2Rio, Huasteca-Potosina.com, Huasteca Secreta, Yumping — 10 sources
**VERIFICATION DATE:** July 2, 2026